<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران (ایرانداک)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8223</Issn>
				<Volume>40</Volume>
				<Issue>ویژه نامه انگلیسی3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparative Assessment of Data Quality Dimensions in Scientific Multimedia Indexing Process</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Comparative Assessment of Data Quality Dimensions in Scientific Multimedia Indexing Process</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>287</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>308</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">722073</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jipm.2024.2021178.1521</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>حمید</FirstName>
					<LastName>حسنی</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار:پژوهشکده فناوری اطلاعات، پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران (ایرانداک)، تهران، ایران.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>آزاده</FirstName>
					<LastName>محبی</LastName>
<Affiliation>پژوهشکده فناوری اطلاعات، پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران (ایرانداک)، تهران، ایران.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-6443-7450</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>محمدجواد</FirstName>
					<LastName>ارشادی</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشیار: پژوهشکده فناوری اطلاعات، پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران (ایرانداک)، تهران، ایران.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>24</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Organizing a large volume of scientific multimedia data requires the use of appropriate indexing methods as one of the processes of information organization. Appropriate methods and algorithms are those that lead to the improvement of various aspects of quality in the process of organizing and retrieving information. For this reason, the purpose of this research is to identify the most important dimensions of data quality in the field of scientific multimedia indexing. In order to achieve this goal, a comparison of different dimensions of data quality has been made based on different criteria and the most important dimensions have been identified using Shannon entropy weighting approach and TOPSIS group ranking method. Also, using the correlation matrix, the intensity and direction of the relationship and correlation between the different dimensions of data quality have been evaluated. Based on the results of the first part of the research, the best ranks (priorities) were related to the data quality dimensions of recall, precision, completeness, appropriate amount of data, accuracy, relevancy, concise 1, consistency, concise 2, interpretability, value-added and accessibility, respectively. The results obtained from the second part of the research showed that the data quality dimensions of interpretability and relevancy had the highest correlation with the most important dimensions, i.e. recall and precision. As one of the implications of this research, it is possible to consider the measurement and evaluation of scientific multimedia data indexing methods based on different aspects of data quality and their importance.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Organizing a large volume of scientific multimedia data requires the use of appropriate indexing methods as one of the processes of information organization. Appropriate methods and algorithms are those that lead to the improvement of various aspects of quality in the process of organizing and retrieving information. For this reason, the purpose of this research is to identify the most important dimensions of data quality in the field of scientific multimedia indexing. In order to achieve this goal, a comparison of different dimensions of data quality has been made based on different criteria and the most important dimensions have been identified using Shannon entropy weighting approach and TOPSIS group ranking method. Also, using the correlation matrix, the intensity and direction of the relationship and correlation between the different dimensions of data quality have been evaluated. Based on the results of the first part of the research, the best ranks (priorities) were related to the data quality dimensions of recall, precision, completeness, appropriate amount of data, accuracy, relevancy, concise 1, consistency, concise 2, interpretability, value-added and accessibility, respectively. The results obtained from the second part of the research showed that the data quality dimensions of interpretability and relevancy had the highest correlation with the most important dimensions, i.e. recall and precision. As one of the implications of this research, it is possible to consider the measurement and evaluation of scientific multimedia data indexing methods based on different aspects of data quality and their importance.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Data quality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Scientific multimedia indexing</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Prioritization and ranking</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Correlation and relationship</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Keyword Extraction</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_722073_9698838a8fa8a01ffd5ed5c71e8e17a3.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
