<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران (ایرانداک)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8223</Issn>
				<Volume>40</Volume>
				<Issue>ویژه نامه انگلیسی 4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Exploring the Synergy between AI and Cybersecurity for Threat Detection</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Exploring the Synergy between AI and Cybersecurity for Threat Detection</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>287</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>314</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">728116</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jipm.2025.728116</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammed Abdul Jaleel</FirstName>
					<LastName>Maktoof</LastName>
<Affiliation>Al-Turath University, Baghdad 10013, Iraq</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abeer</FirstName>
					<LastName>Salim Jamil</LastName>
<Affiliation>Al-Mansour University College, Baghdad 10067, Iraq</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-1874-9282</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mitalipova</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ainura Nurmamatovna</LastName>
<Affiliation>Osh State University, Osh City 723500, Kyrgyzstan</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-1442-2768</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammed</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mubark Salih</LastName>
<Affiliation>Al-Rafidain University College Baghdad 10064, Iraq</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-2497-0389</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Riyam</FirstName>
					<LastName>M. Alsammarraie</LastName>
<Affiliation>5Madenat Alelem University College, Baghdad 10006, Iraq</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0008-8403-9434</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>03</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt;: Security has been a major issue of discussion due to increase in the number and sophistication of Cyber threats in the modern era. Conventional approaches to threat identification might face difficulties in a number of things, namely the relevancy and the ability to process new and constantly evolving threats. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) based Approaches present AI as a potential solution to the problem of efficient threat detection.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective&lt;/strong&gt;: The article aims to compare the RF, SVM, CNNs, and RNNs models’ performance, computational time, and resilience in identifying potential cyber threats, such as malware, phishing, and DoS attacks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods&lt;/strong&gt;: The proposed models were trained as well as evaluated on the NSL-KDD and CICIDS 2017 datasets. This was done based on common scheme indicators including accuracy, precision, recollection, F1 measure, detection rate of efficiency, AUC-ROC, False Alarm Rate (FAR), and the stability to adversaries. Rating of computational efficiency was defined by training time and memory consumption.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;: The findings indicate that the CNNs gave the best accuracy (96%) and resisted perturbation better, and the RF showed good performance with little computational load. RNNs have been proved effective in sequential data analysis and SVM also performed fairly well on binary data classification although there is a problem of scalability.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;: CNNs used in AI models are the best solutions to protection from the threats in the cybersecurity space. Nevertheless, some of them still require computational optimization in order to make those beneficial in scenarios with a limited usage of computational resources. It is suggested that these findings can be used in the context of subsequent research and practical applications.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&lt;strong&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt;: Security has been a major issue of discussion due to increase in the number and sophistication of Cyber threats in the modern era. Conventional approaches to threat identification might face difficulties in a number of things, namely the relevancy and the ability to process new and constantly evolving threats. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) based Approaches present AI as a potential solution to the problem of efficient threat detection.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective&lt;/strong&gt;: The article aims to compare the RF, SVM, CNNs, and RNNs models’ performance, computational time, and resilience in identifying potential cyber threats, such as malware, phishing, and DoS attacks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods&lt;/strong&gt;: The proposed models were trained as well as evaluated on the NSL-KDD and CICIDS 2017 datasets. This was done based on common scheme indicators including accuracy, precision, recollection, F1 measure, detection rate of efficiency, AUC-ROC, False Alarm Rate (FAR), and the stability to adversaries. Rating of computational efficiency was defined by training time and memory consumption.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;: The findings indicate that the CNNs gave the best accuracy (96%) and resisted perturbation better, and the RF showed good performance with little computational load. RNNs have been proved effective in sequential data analysis and SVM also performed fairly well on binary data classification although there is a problem of scalability.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;: CNNs used in AI models are the best solutions to protection from the threats in the cybersecurity space. Nevertheless, some of them still require computational optimization in order to make those beneficial in scenarios with a limited usage of computational resources. It is suggested that these findings can be used in the context of subsequent research and practical applications.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Keywords: AI</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cybersecurity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Threat Detection</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Machine Learning (ML)</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">deep learning (DL)</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Natural Language Processing (NLP)</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Advanced Persistent Threats (APT)</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cyber-attacks</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">AI-driven Systems</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Security Infrastructure</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_728116_af84e456584615254df9c9ade7269627.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
