Aim of this applied research was to extract evaluation criteria of Iranian LIS (Library and Information Science) weblogs. Current research using analytical-survey method and in some stages Webometrics methods evaluated 107 sample weblogs. These weblogs were selected from 222 weblogs that had been submitted in directory of ILIS weblogs. This research made a checklist using literature review, expert's attitude and evaluation criteria of websites. This checklist was used for evaluation sample weblogs after standardizing. Finally a checklist was prepared that included 23 factors for evaluation and ranking of ILIS weblogs.. Finally, current research has suggested that this checklist can be used for judgment in carnivals of chosing top weblogs.
Pakdaman Naeini,M. , Bagheri,M. and Ghaebi,A. (2011). Evaluation and Ranking of Iranian LIS (Library and Information Science) Weblogs. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 26(4), 1121-1138.
MLA
Pakdaman Naeini,M. , , Bagheri,M. , and Ghaebi,A. . "Evaluation and Ranking of Iranian LIS (Library and Information Science) Weblogs", Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 26, 4, 2011, 1121-1138.
HARVARD
Pakdaman Naeini M., Bagheri M., Ghaebi A. (2011). 'Evaluation and Ranking of Iranian LIS (Library and Information Science) Weblogs', Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 26(4), pp. 1121-1138.
CHICAGO
M. Pakdaman Naeini, M. Bagheri and A. Ghaebi, "Evaluation and Ranking of Iranian LIS (Library and Information Science) Weblogs," Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 26 4 (2011): 1121-1138,
VANCOUVER
Pakdaman Naeini M., Bagheri M., Ghaebi A. Evaluation and Ranking of Iranian LIS (Library and Information Science) Weblogs. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2011; 26(4): 1121-1138.
