References
Abooyee Ardakan, M., & Mirzaee, S. A. (2010). Reviewers and ethics of review in Iranian scientific journals. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology. 5 (1&2), 47-36.
Mirzaei, A., Abooyee Ardakan, M., Gharakhani, M., & Sheikh Shoaei, F. (2008). Peer review ethics in scientific journals: case study of Iranian Journal of Sociology. Iranian Journal of Sociology. 7 (4), 147-179
Rajabali Beglou, R., Haji Azizi, N., Karimi, E. (2017). A Review of peer review ethics in research: A study of ethical guidelines in Iranian scientific journals. International Congress of Ethics in Science and Technology. Tehran, Dec. 7-10.
Ahmed, H.S., & Gasparyan, A.Y. (2013). Criticism of peer review and ways to improve it.
European Science Editing, 39 (1), 8-10
Available at: http://www.ease.org.uk/sites/default/files/esefeb13_essay_ahmed_gasparyan.pdf
Bosetti, F., & Toscano, C. D. (2008). Is it time to standardize ethics guiding the peer review process? Lipids. 43 (2), 107-108
Cawley, V. (2011). An analysis of the ethics of peer review and other traditional academic publishing practices. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity. 1(3): 205–213.
Committee On Publicatione Ethics (COPE) (2017). Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers (English). https://doi.org/10.24318/COPE.2019.1.9
D’Angelo, J. G. (2012). Ethics in science: Ethical misconduct in scientific research. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
Gasparyan, A. Y., Ayvazyan, L., Akazhanov, N. A., & Kitas, G. D. (2013). Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Croatian Medical Journal. 54, 600-8
Hope, A. A., & Munro, C. L. (2019). Criticism and judgment: A critical look at scientific peer review. American Journal of Critical Care. 28 (4), 242-245. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2019152
Israel, M, & I. Hay. 2006. Research ethics for social scientists: Between ethical conducts and regulatory compliance. London: Sage.
Jagsi, R., Bennett, K. E., Griffith, K. A., Decastro, R., Grace, G., Holliday, E., & Zietman, A. L. (2014). Attitudes towards Blinding of Peer Review and Perceptions of Efficacy within a Small Biomedical Specialty. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biography Physics. 89 (5), 940-946.
Lipworth, W., & Kerridge, l. (2011). Shifting power relations and the ethics of journal peer review. Social Epistemology. 25 (1), 97–121.
Mulligan, A. (2005). Is peer review in crisis? Oral Oncology. 41 (2), 135–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.11.001
Relman, A. S., & Marcia, A. (1989). How good is peer review? The new England Journal of Medicine. 321 (12), 827- 829.
Rajabali Beglou, R., Rabiei, M., & Rajabali Beglou, Z. 2022. Timeliness and Objective & Constructive Suggestions in Review Ethics: a Case study of the Review Documents of Journal of Information Processing and Management (JIPM). Journal of Information Processing and Management (JIPM). 38 (1), 1-28.
Resnik, D. B., Elmore, S. A. (2016). Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors. Science & Engineering Ethics. 22(1), 169-188.
Resnik, D. B., Elmore, S. A. (2015). Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.
Science and Engineering Ethics. 22 (1). https://doi.org/
10.1007/s11948-015-9625-5
Resnik, D. B., Gutierrez-Ford, C., & Shyamal, P. (2008). Perceptions of Ethical Problems with Scientific Journal Peer Review: An Exploratory Study. Science and Engineering Ethics.14, 305–310.
Rooyen, S. V., Fiona, G., Stephen, E., Smith, R., &
Black, N. (1998). Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial.
Journal of General Internal Medicine. 280 (30), 234-237.
Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of Royal Society of Medicine 99: 178-182. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110109
Souder, L. (2011). The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature. Learned Publishing. 24, 55–74.
Strech , Daniel. (2008). Evidence-based ethics – What it should be and what it shouldn't. BMC Medical Ethic. 9 (16). Doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-16
Thomas, S. P. (2018). Current Controversies Regarding Peer Review in Scholarly Journals. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 39 (2), 99-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2018.1431443
Triggle, C. R., & Triggle, D. J. (2007). What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing? Vascular Health and Risk Management. 3 (1), 39–53
Wagner A.K., Boninger M.L., Levy, C., Chan, L., Gater, D., & Kirby, R.L. (2003). Peer review: Issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitatio. 82, 790–802.
Ware, M. (2008). Peer review: benefits, perceptions and alternatives. Publishing Research Consortium. 4:4-20.
Wendler, D., & Miller, F. (2014). The ethics of peer review in bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics. 40 (10), 697–701.
