Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management

Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management

The Relation between the Combination Levels in the Structure of Concepts Entities and the Amount of Semantic Relations in Improving Information Retrieval Performance in UN, FAO’s Agricultural Ontology

Author
Maziar Amirhosseini
10.52547/jipm.36.4.1113
Abstract
This research aims to identify the relations between the combination levels in concepts structure with the amount of semantic relations through applying quantitative evaluation. Research hypotheses emphasize that there is a significant relations between the level of combination in the structure of concepts and the number of their semantic relationships. The results of the research background showed that there is no investigation on the relations between structure of concepts with different number of words in their structure and the semantic relations to increase IR performance. Research data are extracted from VocBench as an authoritative agricultural ontology, produced by Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), United Nations. The size of the research population is 40,000 agricultural concepts. The sample size is 1,500 concepts selected through stratified random sampling. The analysis of the combination levels of concepts structure has been applied using Excel and SPSS software to operate Proportional Analysis and Frequency Analysis. The relations between concepts structure and semantic relations have been adapted inferential statistics, especially Compare Mean Analysis and Pearson Correlation method using SPSS software reports. The research results show that the results of Factoring Ratio is equal 0.58 between one and two-word concepts, meaning that simple concepts comprise of the dominant domain in ontology. The amount of two-word concepts includes 38.7% of the total concepts. The number of two-word concepts causes decrease of simplicity in concept structure. The average of semantic relations input and output in simple concepts is equal to 6.70 or 7. There is a significant inverse relations between the combination level in concepts structure and the number of taxonomic relations (p-value = 0.000, N = 1500 and r = -0.98) and the number of non-taxonomic relations (p-value = 0.035, N = 1500 and r= -0.54) based on Pearson correlation. It means that an increase in the number of words in concepts structure results in decreasing the number of semantic relations. The results showed that reducing the level of composition in the structure of concepts increases the semantic relations which results in increasing recall and precision in IR performance as well as increasing the integration of the conceptual relations network in ontology. The research results can be used in developing and evaluating the structure of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) such as thesauri regarding structural analysis in IR performance as well as in constructing agricultural ontology of Iran.
Keywords
: Concept Structure
Semantic Relations
Taxonomic Relations
Non-Taxonomic Relations
Structural analysis
Quantitative Evaluations
Agricultural ontology (VocBench)
  1. ابارشی، فاطمه. 1393. ارزیابی اصطلاح‌نامه‌های اصفا، یونسکو و جامع علوم بر اساس استاندارد iso 25964: رویکرد هستی‌شناختی. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی. دانشگاه الزهراء.
  2. ابارشی، فاطمه. 1393. ارزیابی اصطلاح‌نامه‌های اصفا، یونسکو و جامع علوم بر اساس استاندارد iso 25964: رویکرد هستی‌شناختی. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی. دانشگاه الزهراء.
  3. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1386. ارزیابی عوامل کمی و کیفی مؤثر در نظام ذخیره و بازیابی اطلاعات در اصطلاح‌نامه‌های فارسی. پایان‌نامه دکتری. دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی. دانشگاه شیراز.
  4. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1386. ارزیابی عوامل کمی و کیفی مؤثر در نظام ذخیره و بازیابی اطلاعات در اصطلاح‌نامه‌های فارسی. پایان‌نامه دکتری. دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی. دانشگاه شیراز.
  5. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1386ب. ارزیابی کمّی نسبت تعادل در اصطلاح‌نامه‌های علوم اسلامی حرکت به سمت تحلیل توانمندی واژگان مدخل. کلیات کتاب ماه. مهر 1386: 16-29.
  6. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1386ب. ارزیابی کمّی نسبت تعادل در اصطلاح‌نامه‌های علوم اسلامی حرکت به سمت تحلیل توانمندی واژگان مدخل. کلیات کتاب ماه. مهر 1386: 16-29.
  7. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1387. ارزیابی کمّی مقوله پیوستگی در شبکه توصیفگرهای اصطلاح‌نامه اصول فقه، منطق، فلسفه اسلامی، علوم قرآنی و کلام. اصطلاح‌نامه و کاربردهای آن در محیط الکترونیکی: مجموعه مقالات همایش ملی. قم: مرکز اطلاعات و مدارک اسلامی.
  8. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1387. ارزیابی کمّی مقوله پیوستگی در شبکه توصیفگرهای اصطلاح‌نامه اصول فقه، منطق، فلسفه اسلامی، علوم قرآنی و کلام. اصطلاح‌نامه و کاربردهای آن در محیط الکترونیکی: مجموعه مقالات همایش ملی. قم: مرکز اطلاعات و مدارک اسلامی.
  9. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1387ب. ارزیابی کمّی و کیفی اصطلاح‌نامه کب (CAB) . طرح پژوهشی. شماره مصوب پروژه: 85001-0000-01-510000-200-2. مرکز فناوری اطلاعات و اطلاع‌رسانی کشاورزی. سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی. وزارت جهاد کشاورزی.
  10. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1387ب. ارزیابی کمّی و کیفی اصطلاح‌نامه کب (CAB) . طرح پژوهشی. شماره مصوب پروژه: 85001-0000-01-510000-200-2. مرکز فناوری اطلاعات و اطلاع‌رسانی کشاورزی. سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی. وزارت جهاد کشاورزی.
  11. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1396-1398. گزارش نهایی پروژه/ طرح پژوهشی: تحلیل ساختاری دامنه روابط مفهومی در هستی‌شناسی کشاورزی سازمان خواروبار کشاورزی سازمان ملل متحد VocBench. طرح پژوهشی. شماره مصوب پروژه: 91-27-002-960864. تهران: دفتر ارتباطات علمی و همکاری‌های بین‌المللی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی.
  12. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1396-1398. گزارش نهایی پروژه/ طرح پژوهشی: تحلیل ساختاری دامنه روابط مفهومی در هستی‌شناسی کشاورزی سازمان خواروبار کشاورزی سازمان ملل متحد VocBench. طرح پژوهشی. شماره مصوب پروژه: 91-27-002-960864. تهران: دفتر ارتباطات علمی و همکاری‌های بین‌المللی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی.
  13. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1399. طرح پژوهشی: تحلیل ساختاری رفتار تعاملی بین ساختار مفهوم و شمار روابط معنایی در هستی‌شناسی کشاورزی سازمان خواروبار کشاورزی سازمان ملل متحد VocBench. شماره مصوب پروژه: 2-91-27-004-990223. [در حال اجرا]. تهران: دفتر ارتباطات علمی و همکاری‌های بین‌المللی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی.
  14. امیرحسینی، مازیار. 1399. طرح پژوهشی: تحلیل ساختاری رفتار تعاملی بین ساختار مفهوم و شمار روابط معنایی در هستی‌شناسی کشاورزی سازمان خواروبار کشاورزی سازمان ملل متحد VocBench. شماره مصوب پروژه: 2-91-27-004-990223. [در حال اجرا]. تهران: دفتر ارتباطات علمی و همکاری‌های بین‌المللی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی.
  15. امیرحسینی، مازیار و رؤیا محبی. 1387. ارزیابی نسبت عامل‌بندی در ساختار توصیفگرهای اصطلاح‌نامه اصفا و علوم اسلامی: تحلیل سطح پیش‌هم‌ارایی. فصلنامه مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات 20 (3):45-60.
  16. امیرحسینی، مازیار و رؤیا محبی. 1387. ارزیابی نسبت عامل‌بندی در ساختار توصیفگرهای اصطلاح‌نامه اصفا و علوم اسلامی: تحلیل سطح پیش‌هم‌ارایی. فصلنامه مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات 20 (3):45-60.
  17. بهشتی، ملوک‌السادات، و فاطمه اژه‌ای. 1394. طراحی و پیاده‌سازی هستی‌شناسی علوم پایه بر اساس مفاهیم و روابط موجود در اصطلاح‌نامه‌های مرتبط. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات 30 (3): 677-696.
  18. بهشتی، ملوک‌السادات، و فاطمه اژه‌ای. 1394. طراحی و پیاده‌سازی هستی‌شناسی علوم پایه بر اساس مفاهیم و روابط موجود در اصطلاح‌نامه‌های مرتبط. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات 30 (3): 677-696.
  19. ثروتی، لیلا، و محمدرضا ولوی. 1397. ارزیابی هستی‌شناسی‌های مرتبه بالا و ارائه الزامات هستی‌شناسانه مناسب برای کاربردهای نظامی، امنیتی و مدیریت بحران. فصل‌نامه علمی - پژوهشی فرماندهی و کنترل 2 (2): 65-81.
  20. ثروتی، لیلا، و محمدرضا ولوی. 1397. ارزیابی هستی‌شناسی‌های مرتبه بالا و ارائه الزامات هستی‌شناسانه مناسب برای کاربردهای نظامی، امنیتی و مدیریت بحران. فصل‌نامه علمی - پژوهشی فرماندهی و کنترل 2 (2): 65-81.
  21. صنعت‌جو، اعظم، و اکرم فتحیان دستگردی. 1390. مقایسه کارآمدی اصطلاح‌نامه و هستی‌شناسی در بازنمون دانش (طراحی و ساخت نمونه هستی‌شناسی اصفا). پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی 1 (1): 219-240.
  22. صنعت‌جو، اعظم، و اکرم فتحیان دستگردی. 1390. مقایسه کارآمدی اصطلاح‌نامه و هستی‌شناسی در بازنمون دانش (طراحی و ساخت نمونه هستی‌شناسی اصفا). پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی 1 (1): 219-240.
  23. فتحیان دستگردی، اکرم. 1390. ارزیابی هستی‌شناسی‌ها: بررسی معیارها، رویکردها و سطوح. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات. 4: 3-25.
  24. فتحیان دستگردی، اکرم. 1390. ارزیابی هستی‌شناسی‌ها: بررسی معیارها، رویکردها و سطوح. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات. 4: 3-25.
  25. Airio, E. 2006. Word normalization and decompounding in mono- and bilingual IR. Information Retrieval 9 (3): 249-271. [DOI:10.1007/s10791-006-0884-2]
  26. Airio, E. 2006. Word normalization and decompounding in mono- and bilingual IR. Information Retrieval 9 (3): 249-271. [DOI:10.1007/s10791-006-0884-2]
  27. Aitchison, J, A. Gilchrist, and D. Bawden .2000. Thesaurus construction and use: a practical manual. Fourth edition. London: The Association for Information Management (Aslib).
  28. Aitchison, J, A. Gilchrist, and D. Bawden .2000. Thesaurus construction and use: a practical manual. Fourth edition. London: The Association for Information Management (Aslib).
  29. Alani, H., and C. Brewster. 2005. Ontology Ranking Based on The Analysis of Concept Structures. In Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-Cap), Banff, Canada, 2005: pp 51-58. [DOI:10.1145/1088622.1088633]
  30. Alani, H., and C. Brewster. 2005. Ontology Ranking Based on The Analysis of Concept Structures. In Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-Cap), Banff, Canada, 2005: pp 51-58. [DOI:10.1145/1088622.1088633]
  31. Alghamdi, S. M., B. A. Sundberg, J. P. Sundberg, P. N. Schofield, and R. Hoehndorf. 2019. Quantitative evaluation of ontology design patterns for combining pathology and anatomy ontologies. Scientific Reports 9 (1): 1-12. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-40368-1]
  32. Alghamdi, S. M., B. A. Sundberg, J. P. Sundberg, P. N. Schofield, and R. Hoehndorf. 2019. Quantitative evaluation of ontology design patterns for combining pathology and anatomy ontologies. Scientific Reports 9 (1): 1-12. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-40368-1]
  33. Amirhosseini. M. 2016. Analysis of concept structure and semantic relations based on graph-independent structural analysis. Ph. D. Dissertation, Supervisor Juhana Salim. Faculty of Information Sciences and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
  34. Amirhosseini. M. 2016. Analysis of concept structure and semantic relations based on graph-independent structural analysis. Ph. D. Dissertation, Supervisor Juhana Salim. Faculty of Information Sciences and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
  35. _____, and J. Salim. 2010. Quantitative Evaluation of Simplicity Invisible Domain in Islamic Knowledge Organizations. In 2010 International Conference on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Management: CAMP 10, exploring the invisible word (17-18 March 2010, Shah Alam, Malaysia). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 119-124.
  36. _____, and J. Salim. 2010. Quantitative Evaluation of Simplicity Invisible Domain in Islamic Knowledge Organizations. In 2010 International Conference on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Management: CAMP 10, exploring the invisible word (17-18 March 2010, Shah Alam, Malaysia). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 119-124.
  37. _____. 2011. OntoAbsolute as an Ontology Evaluation Methodology in Analysis of the Structural Domains in Upper, Middle and Lower Level Ontologies. In STAIR'11: International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval28th to 29th June 2011, Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Malaysia: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011, 26-33.
  38. _____. 2011. OntoAbsolute as an Ontology Evaluation Methodology in Analysis of the Structural Domains in Upper, Middle and Lower Level Ontologies. In STAIR'11: International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval28th to 29th June 2011, Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Malaysia: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011, 26-33.
  39. _____. 2015. Quantitative evaluation of the movement from complexity toward simplicity in the structure of thesaurus descriptors. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 20 (3): 47-62.
  40. _____. 2015. Quantitative evaluation of the movement from complexity toward simplicity in the structure of thesaurus descriptors. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 20 (3): 47-62.
  41. _____. 2019a. Structural Analysis of Semantic Relations regarding Integration and Association of Semantic Network in VocBench as an Agricultural Ontology. International Journal of Engineering Technology and Management Research 6 (3): 41-57. [DOI:10.29121/ijetmr.v6.i5.2019.371]
  42. _____. 2019a. Structural Analysis of Semantic Relations regarding Integration and Association of Semantic Network in VocBench as an Agricultural Ontology. International Journal of Engineering Technology and Management Research 6 (3): 41-57. [DOI:10.29121/ijetmr.v6.i5.2019.371]
  43. _____. 2019b. A Synthesis Survey of Ontology Evaluation Tools, Applications and Methods to Propose a Novel Branch in Evaluating the Structure of Ontologies: Graph-Independent Approach. International Journal of Computer 33 (1): 46-68.
  44. _____. 2019b. A Synthesis Survey of Ontology Evaluation Tools, Applications and Methods to Propose a Novel Branch in Evaluating the Structure of Ontologies: Graph-Independent Approach. International Journal of Computer 33 (1): 46-68.
  45. Assal, H., K. Pohl, and J. Pohl. 2009. The Representation of Context in Computer Software, In Pre-Conference Proceedings, Focus Symposium on Knowledge Management Systems, InterSymp-2009, Baden-Baden, Germany, 4 August, 2009.
  46. Assal, H., K. Pohl, and J. Pohl. 2009. The Representation of Context in Computer Software, In Pre-Conference Proceedings, Focus Symposium on Knowledge Management Systems, InterSymp-2009, Baden-Baden, Germany, 4 August, 2009.
  47. Bergman, M. 2015. Conceptual and Practical Distinctions in the Attributes Ontology. In Adaptive Information, Innovation and Infrastructure (AI 3). https://www.mkbergman.com/1842/conceptual-and-practical-distinctions-in-the-attributes-ontology/#:~:text=Attribute%20%E2%80%94%20an%20inherent%20characteristic%20of,share%20the%20same%20potential%20attributes (accessed Feb. 14, 2020)
  48. Bergman, M. 2015. Conceptual and Practical Distinctions in the Attributes Ontology. In Adaptive Information, Innovation and Infrastructure (AI 3). https://www.mkbergman.com/1842/conceptual-and-practical-distinctions-in-the-attributes-ontology/#:~:text=Attribute%20%E2%80%94%20an%20inherent%20characteristic%20of,share%20the%20same%20potential%20attributes (accessed Feb. 14, 2020)
  49. Brewster, C., H. Alani, S. Dasmahapatra, Y. Wilks. 2004. Data driven ontology evaluation. In Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Lisbon, Portugal, 2004. European Language Resources Association.
  50. Brewster, C., H. Alani, S. Dasmahapatra, Y. Wilks. 2004. Data driven ontology evaluation. In Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Lisbon, Portugal, 2004. European Language Resources Association.
  51. British Standards Institution (BS). 1979. BS 5723:1979: Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri. London: British Standards Institution.
  52. British Standards Institution (BS). 1979. BS 5723:1979: Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri. London: British Standards Institution.
  53. _____. 1985. BS 6723:1985. Guide to establishment and development of multilingual thesauri. London: British Standards Institution.
  54. _____. 1985. BS 6723:1985. Guide to establishment and development of multilingual thesauri. London: British Standards Institution.
  55. _____. 2005-8. BS 8723: Structured vocabularies for information retrieval - Guide. (Published in five separate parts between 2005 and 2008). London: British Standards Institution.
  56. _____. 2005-8. BS 8723: Structured vocabularies for information retrieval - Guide. (Published in five separate parts between 2005 and 2008). London: British Standards Institution.
  57. Burton-Jones, A., V. C. Storey, V. Sugumaran and P. Ahluwalia. 2003. Assessing the Effectiveness of the DAML Ontologies for the Semantic. In Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems. Burg (Spreewald), Germany, 56-69.
  58. Burton-Jones, A., V. C. Storey, V. Sugumaran and P. Ahluwalia. 2003. Assessing the Effectiveness of the DAML Ontologies for the Semantic. In Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems. Burg (Spreewald), Germany, 56-69.
  59. Chmielewski, M., and P. Stpor. 2016. Medical Data Unification Using Ontology-Based Semantic Model Structural Analysis. witek J., Borzemski L., Grzech A., Wilimowska Z. (eds) In Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 36th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology - ISAT 2015 - Part III. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 431. Springer, Cham. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-28564-1_12]
  60. Chmielewski, M., and P. Stpor. 2016. Medical Data Unification Using Ontology-Based Semantic Model Structural Analysis. witek J., Borzemski L., Grzech A., Wilimowska Z. (eds) In Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 36th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology - ISAT 2015 - Part III. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 431. Springer, Cham. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-28564-1_12]
  61. Eynard, D., M. Matteucci and F. A. Marfa. 2012. Modular Framework to Learn Seed Ontologies From Test. Semi-Automatic Ontology Development: Processes And Resources. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2012.
  62. Eynard, D., M. Matteucci and F. A. Marfa. 2012. Modular Framework to Learn Seed Ontologies From Test. Semi-Automatic Ontology Development: Processes And Resources. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2012.
  63. Furletti, B. 2009. Ontology-driven knowledge discovery. Lucca, Italy: IMT Institute for Advanced Studies.
  64. Furletti, B. 2009. Ontology-driven knowledge discovery. Lucca, Italy: IMT Institute for Advanced Studies.
  65. Gangemi, A., C. Catenacci, M. Ciaramita and J. Lehmann. 2005. A theoretical framework for ontology evaluation and validation. In Proceedings of [DOI:10.1007/11762256_13]
  66. Gangemi, A., C. Catenacci, M. Ciaramita and J. Lehmann. 2005. A theoretical framework for ontology evaluation and validation. In Proceedings of [DOI:10.1007/11762256_13]
  67. the 2nd Italian Semantic Web Workshop SWAP, Italy 2005.
  68. the 2nd Italian Semantic Web Workshop SWAP, Italy 2005.
  69. Gangemi, A., C. Catenacci, M. Ciaramita and J. Lehmann. 2006. Modelling ontology evaluation and validation. In: Y. Sure, & J. Domingue (eds). The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. The 3rd European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4011. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/11762256_13]
  70. Gangemi, A., C. Catenacci, M. Ciaramita and J. Lehmann. 2006. Modelling ontology evaluation and validation. In: Y. Sure, & J. Domingue (eds). The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. The 3rd European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4011. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/11762256_13]
  71. Gregory, K., P. T. Groth, H.Cousijn, A. Scharnhorst, S. Wyatt. 2017 Searching Data: A Review of Observational Data Retrieval Practices. CoRR abs/1707.06937. http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06937. (accessed May 5, 2020)
  72. Gregory, K., P. T. Groth, H.Cousijn, A. Scharnhorst, S. Wyatt. 2017 Searching Data: A Review of Observational Data Retrieval Practices. CoRR abs/1707.06937. http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06937. (accessed May 5, 2020)
  73. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 1985. ISO 5964:1985: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
  74. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 1985. ISO 5964:1985: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
  75. _____. 1986. ISO 2788: Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri (2nd. ed.). Geneva: International Standards Organization.
  76. _____. 1986. ISO 2788: Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri (2nd. ed.). Geneva: International Standards Organization.
  77. _____. 2011. ISO/FDIS 25964-1: Information and documentation -thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies - Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; Final Draft circulated April 2011.
  78. _____. 2011. ISO/FDIS 25964-1: Information and documentation -thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies - Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; Final Draft circulated April 2011.
  79. _____. 2013. ISO/FDIS 25964-2: Information and documentation -thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies - Part 2: Part 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; Final Draft circulated April 2011.
  80. _____. 2013. ISO/FDIS 25964-2: Information and documentation -thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies - Part 2: Part 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; Final Draft circulated April 2011.
  81. Jain, S., and V. Meyer. 2018. Evaluation and Refinement of Emergency Situation Ontology. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 8 (10): 713-719. [DOI:10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.10.1127]
  82. Jain, S., and V. Meyer. 2018. Evaluation and Refinement of Emergency Situation Ontology. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 8 (10): 713-719. [DOI:10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.10.1127]
  83. Jamoulle, M. 2015. The Words of Prevention, Part II: Ten Terms in the Realm of Quaternary Prevention. Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade 10 (35): 1-10. [DOI:10.5712/rbmfc10(35)1063]
  84. Jamoulle, M. 2015. The Words of Prevention, Part II: Ten Terms in the Realm of Quaternary Prevention. Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade 10 (35): 1-10. [DOI:10.5712/rbmfc10(35)1063]
  85. Kang, D., B. Xu, J. Lu and W. Chu. 2004. A Complexity Measure for Ontology Based on UML. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems (FTDCS'04 Suzhou, China) pp.: 222-228.
  86. Kang, D., B. Xu, J. Lu and W. Chu. 2004. A Complexity Measure for Ontology Based on UML. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems (FTDCS'04 Suzhou, China) pp.: 222-228.
  87. Krejcie, R. V., and D. W. Morgan. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement 30: 607-610. [DOI:10.1177/001316447003000308]
  88. Krejcie, R. V., and D. W. Morgan. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement 30: 607-610. [DOI:10.1177/001316447003000308]
  89. Lazarinis, F., J. Vilares, J. Tait, and E.N. Efthimiadis. 2009. Current research issues and trends in non-English Web searching. Information Retrieval 12 (3): 230-250. [DOI:10.1007/s10791-009-9093-0]
  90. Lazarinis, F., J. Vilares, J. Tait, and E.N. Efthimiadis. 2009. Current research issues and trends in non-English Web searching. Information Retrieval 12 (3): 230-250. [DOI:10.1007/s10791-009-9093-0]
  91. Leveling, J., W. Magdy, G. J. F. Jones. 2011. An investigation of decompounding for cross-language patent search. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information, July 24-28. Beijing, China, 1169-1170. [DOI:10.1145/2009916.2010103]
  92. Leveling, J., W. Magdy, G. J. F. Jones. 2011. An investigation of decompounding for cross-language patent search. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information, July 24-28. Beijing, China, 1169-1170. [DOI:10.1145/2009916.2010103]
  93. Martín Chozas, P. 2018. Towards a Linked Open Data Cloud of Language Resources in the Legal Domain. Master Thesis, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Informáticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 2018.
  94. Martín Chozas, P. 2018. Towards a Linked Open Data Cloud of Language Resources in the Legal Domain. Master Thesis, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Informáticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 2018.
  95. Monz, C. and M. de Rijke. 2002. Shallow morphological analysis in monolingual retrieval for Dutch, German, and Italian. Accessing Multilingual Information Repositories, vol. 2406 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Pp.: 262-277. [DOI:10.1007/3-540-45691-0_24]
  96. Monz, C. and M. de Rijke. 2002. Shallow morphological analysis in monolingual retrieval for Dutch, German, and Italian. Accessing Multilingual Information Repositories, vol. 2406 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Pp.: 262-277. [DOI:10.1007/3-540-45691-0_24]
  97. Mungall, C. 2005. Increased complexity in the GO. Available at: http://www.fruitfly.org/~cjm/obol/doc/go- complexity.html (accessed Feb. 20, 2020)
  98. Mungall, C. 2005. Increased complexity in the GO. Available at: http://www.fruitfly.org/~cjm/obol/doc/go- complexity.html (accessed Feb. 20, 2020)
  99. National Information Standards Organization (NISO). 2005. Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies: ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005, Bethesda Md.: NISO Press.
  100. National Information Standards Organization (NISO). 2005. Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies: ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005, Bethesda Md.: NISO Press.
  101. Simperl, E. 2009. Reusing ontologies on the Semantic Web: A feasibility study. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68: 905-925. [DOI:10.1016/j.datak.2009.02.002]
  102. Simperl, E. 2009. Reusing ontologies on the Semantic Web: A feasibility study. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68: 905-925. [DOI:10.1016/j.datak.2009.02.002]
  103. Velardi, P., R. Navigli, A. Cucchiarelli, F.Neri, P. Buitelaar, P. Cimiano and B.Magnini (ed.). 2005. Evaluation of OntoLearn, a methodology for automatic learning of domain ontologies. Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
  104. Velardi, P., R. Navigli, A. Cucchiarelli, F.Neri, P. Buitelaar, P. Cimiano and B.Magnini (ed.). 2005. Evaluation of OntoLearn, a methodology for automatic learning of domain ontologies. Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
  105. Xamena, E., N. B. Brignole, and A. Maguitman. 2017. Structural Analysis of topic ontologies. Information Sciences. 421, 15-29. [DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.081]
  106. Xamena, E., N. B. Brignole, and A. Maguitman. 2017. Structural Analysis of topic ontologies. Information Sciences. 421, 15-29. [DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.081]
  107. Zhang, D., C. Ye, and Z. Yang. 2006. An Evaluation Method for Ontology Complexity Analysis in Ontology Evolution. S. Staab and V. Svatek (Eds.). EKAW 2006, LNAI 4248, International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management No15, Podebrady, Tcheque, Republique. 4248, 214-221. [DOI:10.1007/11891451_20]
  108. Zhang, D., C. Ye, and Z. Yang. 2006. An Evaluation Method for Ontology Complexity Analysis in Ontology Evolution. S. Staab and V. Svatek (Eds.). EKAW 2006, LNAI 4248, International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management No15, Podebrady, Tcheque, Republique. 4248, 214-221. [DOI:10.1007/11891451_20]
Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management
Volume 36, Issue 4 - Serial Number 106
Summer 2021
Pages 1113-1136

  • Receive Date 10 December 2022