Network Analysis of Twitter Users in Iran; Studying Public Sphere Properties

Abdollahyan, Hamid; Saleh, Soha

doi:10.22034/jipm.2024.711525

Network Analysis of Twitter Users in Iran; Studying Public Sphere Properties

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Hamid Abdollahyan ¹

Soha Saleh ²

¹ Department of Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran

² PhD Student at Department of Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, Univ ersity of Tehran

10.22034/jipm.2024.711525

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate whether features of the public sphere are present in the activities of Iranian Twitter users. To achieve this objective, the paper provides a synthesis of computational social sciences, network analysis, and Habermas’s approach to the public sphere. The data comes from all Iranian users, including those who are actively engaged in political issues on Twitter. This method of data collection focuses on the computational aspects of the users. Added information on how they conducted networking and facilitated public opinion, which resulted in increased user interaction, would complete the data-gathering process to align with the theoretical claims. It also indicates that Twitter was a platform on which Iranian users fulfilled the requirements of the public sphere. Some of the findings indicate that there were 48,076 users connected with 25,534,713 edges, and together, they formed three communities. While one of the communities focused solely on social issues, the other two engaged in a rival political challenge. It seems that this situation exemplified the main characteristic of the public sphere, namely, the freedom to express political views and the formation of diverse communities with competing ideas.

Keywords

Habermas

public sphere

Twitter

public opinion

social network analysis

Subjects

Human and information

References

Urman, A. (2020). Context matters: political polarization on Twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 42(6), 857-879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876541

Aggarwal, C. C. (2011). Social Network Data Analytics. Londen: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8462-3

Aiello, L., Barrat, A., Schifanella, R., Cattuto, C., Markines, B., & Menczer, F. (2012). Friendship Prediction and Homophily in Social Media. ACM Transactions on the Web, 6(2), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2180861.2180866

Azad Aramaki, T., & Yahia, E. (2005). Developing Public Sphere and Rational Dialogue. Iranian Sociological of Association, 58-89.

Barberá, P., Jost, J., & Nagler, J. (2015). Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531-1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620

Batorski, D., & Grzywińska, I. (2018). Three Dimensions of the Public Sphere on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 356-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281329

Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017). The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks. Political Psychology, 38(3), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12337

Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2018). Introduction to Computational Social Science. Virginia: Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50131-4

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12084

Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. Londen: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270066

Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, translated by with the assistance of. (T. Burger, Trans.) (with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence) Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press (originally published in German in 1962).

Hauser, G. A. (1987). Features of the public sphere. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4(4), 437-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038709360156

Johannessen, M. R. (2014). Political Social Media Sites as Public Sphere: A Case Study of the Norwegian Labour Party. Communications of the Association for Information Systems.

Johannessen, M. R., & Følstad, A. (2014). Political Social Media Sites as Public Sphere: A Case Study of the Norwegian Labour Party. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03456

Kadushin, C. (2012). Understanding Social Networks; Theorie, Concepts, and Findings. New York: Oxford University Press.

Prell, C. (2012). Social Network Analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Rauchfleisch, A., & Kovic, M. (2016). The Internet and Generalized Functions of the Public Sphere: Transformative Potentials From a Comparative Perspective. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116646393

Smith, J. A., McPherson, M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2014). Social Distance in the United States: Sex, Race, Religion, Age, and Education Homophily among Confidants, 1985 to 2004. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 432-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414531776

Takikawa, H., & Nagayoshi, K. (2017). Political Polarization in Social Media: Analysis of the “Twitter Political Field” in Japan. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (p. 8). Boston, MA, USA: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2017.8258291

Urman, A. (2019). Context matters: political polarization on Twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 42(6), 857-879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876541