Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management

Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management

A Systematic Review of Innovation Ecosystem Subcategory Metaphors: Towards Evidence-Based Policy Making

Document Type : Evidence based policy making for science and technology

Authors
1 Department of Information Technology Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2 National Research Institute for Sciences Policy, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
In recent years, ecological metaphors have been widely used in the field of innovation. Such excessive preoccupation of researchers with common ecological metaphors such as ecosystems and lack of due attention to the development of other ecological axioms challenges its systematic conceptual web. This renders such metaphor “boundary object” which would hinder linking theoretical discussions on innovation ecosystem to practical usages and policy making. Therefore, there is a need for an evidence-based approach to define and map the innovation ecosystem in a metaphorical way that the deployed concepts would constitute a part of the conceptual network of innovation ecosystem. As an endeavor to EBP in the field of innovation ecosystem, this study draws on Scaringella’s and Radziwon’s (2019) systematic review framework and the comparative-qualitative content analysis method based on the structured matrix which grounded in metaphor mapping. Upon analyzing the content of the selected articles, the ecological metaphors grounded in innovation ecosystems can be classified into two general categories: metaphors concerned with actor (species, population, and community) and metaphors concerned with environment (landscape, biome, and ecotone). As a tool, the developed framework enables innovation policymakers to make decisions based on an effectual understanding of seven hierarchical metaphorical layers of innovation ecosystems. Consequently, policymakers should not restrict their governance to the recommendations provided by the literature on ecosystems that is popular at the present time; rather, with the same energy, they should consider the multiple dimensions of innovation ecosystems in terms of actors, environment, and the relationships between them based on an ecological perspective. Methodology: As an endeavor to EBP in the field of innovation ecosystem, this study draws on Scaringella’s and Radziwon’s (2019) systematic review framework and the comparative-qualitative content analysis method based on the structured matrix which grounded in metaphor mapping.
Findings: Overall, we have contributed to the innovation ecosystem literature by identifying the seven hierarchical layers of ecological metaphor integrated in a conceptual framework that tend to be a metaphorical redefinition and mapping of innovation ecosystem : landscape, biome, ecotone , species, population, community and ecosystem
Conclusion: As a tool, developed framework enables innovation policymakers to make decisions based on an effectual understanding of the multiple dimensions of innovation ecosystems. Also our results suggest that in the definition and developing of the innovation ecosystem, the conceptual network of this metaphor (especially the seven hierarchical layers) should be considered in order to achieve a more accurate understanding of the dynamics of ecosystem through the lens of ecology. Consequently, policymakers should not restrict their governance to the recommendations provided by the literature on ecosystems that is popular at the present time; rather, with the same energy, they should consider the multiple dimensions of innovation ecosystems in terms of actors, environment, and the relationships between them based on an ecological perspective.
Keywords
Subjects

References

Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 625-648.
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58.
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84(4), 98.
Adner, R. (2013). The wide lens: What successful innovators see that others miss. Penguin.
Allen, T. F., Shaw, D., Allen, P. C., & Spohrerin, J. (2013). Insights into the relationship between products and services coming from biology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(5), 570-579.
Allen, T. F., & Hoekstra, T. W. (2015). Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571.‏
Asefi, Sedigheh, David Nunes Resende, and Marlene Paula Castro Amorim. "Modeling a successful innovation ecosystem toward a sustainable community: The I-Reef (a review study)." Energy Reports 6 (2020): 593-598.
Attrill, M. J., & Rundle, S. D. (2002). Ecotone or ecocline: ecological boundaries in estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 55(6), 929-936.
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems (pp. 204-288). The Oxford handbook of innovation management.
Ballard, W. (2011). Predator–prey relationships. In Biology and management of white-tailed deer (pp. 264-299). CRC Press.
Battistoni, C., & Barbero, S. (2020). Design of an ecosystem to foster systemic eco-innovation: Systemic design for autopoietic local economies. FormAkademisk, 13(2).
Bomtempo, J. V., Alves, F. C., & de Almeida Oroski, F. (2017). Developing new platform chemicals: what is required for a new bio-based molecule to become a platform chemical in the bioeconomy?. Faraday discussions, 202, 213-225.
Bowman, W. D., Sally, D. H., and Michael Lee Cain. (2021). Ecology.
Breslin, D., Kask, J., Schlaile, M., & Abatecola, G. (2021). Developing a coevolutionary account of innovation ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 98, 59-68.
Bronstein, J. L. (Ed.). (2015). Mutualism. Oxford University Press.
Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2013). The organization of innovation in ecosystems: Problem framing, problem solving, and patterns of coupling. In Collaboration and competition in business ecosystems (pp. 167-194). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Bushueva, M. A., Masyuk, N. N., Bragina, Z. V., Petrukhin, A. B., & Grishanova, O. A. (2017). Representation of the business model of textile cluster as an innovating network ecosystem.
Campbell, S., Benita, S., Coates, E., Davies, P., & Penn, G. (2007). Analysis for policy: Evidence-based policy in practice. Government Social Research Unit.
Catanzaro, M. (1988). Using qualitative analytical techniques. Nursing research: Theory and practice, 437, 456.
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research policy, 43(7), 1164-1176.
Connell, J. H. (1980). Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos, 131-138.
Cornelissen, J. P. (2004). What are we playing at? Theatre, organization, and the use of metaphor. Organization Studies, 25(5), 705-726.
Dedehayir, Ozgur, Saku J. Mäkinen, and J. Roland Ortt. "Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 136 (2018): 18-29.
Dubina, I. N. (2015). A business simulation game as an approach to model an innovation ecosystem. 65go, 318.
Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (1999). Systems of innovation: theory and policy for the demand side. Technology in society, 21(1), 63-79.‌
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
Engler, J., & Kusiak, A. (2011). Modeling an innovation ecosystem with adaptive agents. International journal of innovation science, 3(2), 55-68.
Eppler, M. J., & Platts, K. W. (2009). Visual strategizing: the systematic use of visualization in the strategic-planning process. Long Range Planning, 42(1), 42-74.
Freeman, C. (1990). The economics of innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Fuglsang, L., & Rønning, R. (2014). Introduction: Framing innovation in public service sectors: A contextual approach. In Framing innovation in public service sectors (pp. 1-17). Routledge.
Futuyma, D. J., & Kirkpatrick, M. (2013). Evolution. Sunderland, MA.
Ghazinoory, S., Phillips, F., Afshari-Mofrad, M., & Bigdelou, N. (2021). Innovation lives in ecotones, not ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 135, 572-580.
Gobble, M. M. (2014). Charting the innovation ecosystem. Research-technology management, 57(4), 55-59.
Goldstein, P. Z., Desalle, R., Amato, G., & Vogler, A. P. (2000). Conservation genetics at the species boundary. Conservation biology, 14(1), 120-131.
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90, 102098.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2005). Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social science & medicine, 61(2), 417-430.
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Ectj, 29(2), 75-91.
Hall, B., & Hallgrímsson, B. (2008). Strickberger's evolution. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public money and management, 25(1), 27-34.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard business review, 82(3), 68-78.
Iyawa, G. E., Herselman, M., & Botha, A. (2019, September). Building a digital health innovation ecosystem framework through design science research. In 2019 Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications (NextComp) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.Jackson, Deborah J. "What is an innovation ecosystem." National science foundation 1, no. 2 (2011): 1-13.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
Levin, S. A. (1998). Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems, 1, 431-436.
Lewontin, R. C. (1970). The units of selection. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 1(1), 1-18.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lundvall, B. Å. (1992). User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalization. National systems of innovation.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications.
McGinley, S., Wei, W., Zhang, L., & Zheng, Y. (2021). The state of qualitative research in hospitality: A 5-year review 2014 to 2019. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 62(1), 8-20.
Mercier-Laurent, E. (2015). The innovation biosphere: Planet and brains in the digital era. John Wiley & Sons.
Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Administrative science quarterly, 605-622.
Morjan, C. L., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2004). How species evolve collectively: implications of gene flow and selection for the spread of advantageous alleles. Molecular ecology, 13(6), 1341-1356.
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ self–regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 37(5), 1071-1097.
Odum, E. P., and Gary W. B. (1971). Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Oksanen, K., & Hautamäki, A. (2014). Transforming regions into innovation ecosystems: A model for renewing local industrial structures. The Innovation Journal, 19(2), 1.
Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based policy: The promise of realist syntheses. Evaluation, 8(3), 340-358.
Petticrew, M. (2003). Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions. Bmj, 326(7392), 756-758.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Rabelo, R. J., & Bernus, P. (2015). A holistic model of building innovation ecosystems. Ifac-Papersonline, 48(3), 2250-2257.
Rantanen, M. M., Koskinen, J., & Hyrynsalmi, S. (2019, May). E-government ecosystem: A new view to explain complex phenomenon. In 2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) (pp. 1408-1413). IEEE.
Ritala, P., & Almpanopoulou, A. (2017). In defense of ‘eco’in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, 60, 39-42.
Romme, G. (2016). The quest for professionalism: The case of management and entrepreneurship. Oxford University Press.
Rubens, N., Still, K., Huhtamäki, J., & Russell, M. G. (2011). A Network Analysis of Investment Firms as Resource Routers in Chinese Innovation Ecosystem. J. Softw., 6(9), 1737-1745.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin. Research in nursing & health, 18(4), 371-375.
Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence‐based policy making. Public administration, 80(1), 1-22.
Scaringella, L., & Radziwon, A. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 59-87.
Scozzi, B., Bellantuono, N., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Managing open innovation in urban labs. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26, 857-874
Shaw, D. R., & Allen, T. (2018). Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 88-102.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63-75.
Spee, A. P., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2009). Strategy tools as boundary objects. Strategic organization, 7(2), 223-232.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science, 19(3), 387-420.‏
Sutcliffe, S. (2005). Evidence-Based Policymaking: What is it? How does it work? What relevance for developing countries? Overseas Development Institute, 1-10.
Talmar, M., Walrave, B., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Holmström, J., & Romme, A. G. L. (2020). Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The Ecosystem Pie Model. Long Range Planning, 53(4), 101850.
Tamayo-Orbegozo, U., Vicente-Molina, M. A., & Villarreal-Larrinaga, O. (2017). Eco-innovation strategic model. A multiple-case study from a highly eco-innovative European region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1347-1367.
orfing, J. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press, USA.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, 14(3), 207-222.
Veit, W., & Ney, M. (2021). Metaphors in arts and science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(2), 44.
Wade, M. J. (2007). The co-evolutionary genetics of ecological communities. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8(3), 185-195.
Walrave, B., Talmar, M., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Romme, A. G. L., & Verbong, G. P. (2018). A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation. Technological forecasting and social change, 136, 103-113.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, xiii-xxiii.
Wei, T., & Lei, L. (2014, May). A Multi-Agent System Model Framework of Regional Technology Innovation Ecosystem. In International Conference on Logistics Engineering, Management and Computer Science (LEMCS 2014) (pp. 1057-1060). Atlantis Press.
Wells, J. V., & Richmond, M. E. (1995). Populations, metapopulations, and species populations: what are they and who should care?. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 458-462.
Woolhouse, M. E., Webster, J. P., Domingo, E., Charlesworth, B., & Levin, B. R. (2002). Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts. Nature genetics, 32(4), 569-577.
Wu, J., & Hobbs, R. J. (Eds.). (2007). Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press.
Zachos, F. E. (2016). Species concepts in biology (Vol. 801). Cham: Springer.
Zahra, S. A., & Nambisan, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business horizons, 55(3), 219-229.

  • Receive Date 08 June 2023
  • Revise Date 14 August 2023
  • Accept Date 28 February 2024