Iranian scientific database (Ganj) has hundreds of thousands of records and is one of the largest scientific treasures in the country. Optimal use of this database can be done by analyzing information and providing a representation of the research performance of stakeholders and with organizational dashboards. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify the needs of organizational dashboard design in the Iranian scientific database (Ganj). A look at the background of research in Iran as well as similar dashboards in various subject areas showed that different types of dashboards have been designed or various researches have been done in this field. However, with the exception of one example, most dashboards are designed for databases related to scholarly articles. Also, the researches related to the key indicators and metrics of the performance of educational and research institutes were only in the framework of data related to the educational activities of students and no background was found in the field of research performance for dissertations and dissertations. Therefore, the study continued with interviews with participants about their views on stakeholders and their needs; The position of ETD in their institutions and, of course, in measuring performance was examined. In Iran, "Ganj" has three dashboards: Parsa, Parsagar and TIK (similarity-check), but these dashboards are designed in general and only based on the needs of the research institute in interaction with macro-policies and the needs of educational and research institutes are not considered in their design. In the method section, The present research was applied and surveyed in a consecutive mixed manner. The research began with a review of the research background, and after reviewing the current "treasure" dashboards, policy makers, research assistants / central library heads were interviewed. The research began with a review of the research background, and after reviewing the current "treasure" dashboards, policy makers, central library heads interviewed. Then, by examining similar samples, efficient metrics and indicators to monitor the research performance of these institutes were identified and extracted. The indicators considered by the panel members for performance monitoring were approved by the members in 8 general categories. These eight categories include research quantity indicators; Research quality; Ethical; Alteration; awards; Output taken; Commercialization; And it was the kind of research. From the panel members' point of view, all indicators and metrics can be available at the general level, except for the ethics index and the similarity percentage measure (similarity-check) at the general level. In the Ethics Index, the percentage of similarity (similarity-check) measure from the perspective of panel members, because its general aspect is not important, its reports need to be accessible at higher levels. Finally, a conceptual model of organizational dashboard design requirements for this database was drawn.