پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات

پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات

استفاده مسئولانه از ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی در نگارش و ارزیابی علمی؛ کاربست‌های اخلاقاً مجاز و غیرمجاز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
رحمان شریف زاده
پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران (ایرانداک)؛ تهران، ایران؛
10.22034/jipm.2025.2068070.2069
چکیده
گسترش روزافزون کاربست‌های هوش مصنوعی در فعالیت‌های علمی، برخی کنشگران این حوزه به ویژه ناشران و دانشگاه‌ها را بر آن داشته تا به تنظیم‌گری و هنجارمند کردن این کاربست‌ها بپردازند تا در کنار بهره‌گیری از این فناوری، پیامدهای نامطلوب آن را کنترل کنند. ناشران،‌ انجمن‌ها و دانشگاه‌های زیادی به تدوین و ارائه سیاست‌هایی برای این تنظیم‌گری پرداخته‌اند. با این ‌حال، در ایران هنوز نهادهای سیاست‌گذار در سپهر پژوهش و همچنین مؤسسات آموزشی-پژوهشی به این مسئله توجه کافی نکرده‌اند. در این پژوهش کوشش می‌شود با مطالعه رویکردها و مواضع مهم‌ترین ناشران، انجمن‌های حوزه اخلاق انتشار، و همچنین دانشگاه‌های طراز اول جهان، مجموعه‌ رهنمودهایی که کاربست‌های مجاز و غیرمجاز هوش مصنوعی در نگارش و ارزیابی علمی را مشخص می‌کنند، ارائه شود. ازنظر روش‌شناختی، رسیدن به این مجموعه از رهنمودها متشکل از چهار گامِ گردآوری داده تا نقطه اشباع، دسته‌بندی سیاست‌ها، تدوین و توجیه رهنمودها، و بررسی و تعدیل رهنمودها در یک گروه کانونی متشکل از متخصصان مرتبط بوده است. یافته اصلی مقاله مجموعه‌ای از رهنمودها برای سه کنشگر اصلی نگارش و ارزیابی علمی، یعنی مؤلفان، داوران و سردبیران خواهد بود. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
هوش مصنوعی
ال‌ال‌ام
اخلاق
سیاست‌گذاری
رهنمودهای اخلاقی
مؤلف
داور
سردبیر
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Scientific Writing and Evaluation; Ethically Permissible and Impermissible Applications

نویسنده English

Rahman Sharifzadeh
Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IRANDOC); Tehran, Iran;
چکیده English

The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific activities has led various stakeholders, particularly publishers and universities to establish regulations and standards to mitigate the potential negative impacts of this technology. Numerous publishers, associations, and academic institutions have developed and implemented policies to address these concerns. This study examines the approaches and positions of leading publishers, publication ethics associations, and prestigious universities worldwide to formulate a comprehensive set of guidelines delineating the permissible and impermissible uses of AI in scientific writing and evaluation. The methodology for developing these guidelines involved four key steps: data collection until saturation was reached, classification of existing policies, development and justification of the guidelines, and review and refinement of the guidelines through a focus group of relevant experts. The primary outcome of this research will be a set of guidelines tailored for the three main stakeholders in scientific writing and evaluation: authors, reviewers, and editors.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Artificial Intelligence
LLMs
Ethics
Ethical Guidelines
Policy
Authors
Reviewers
Editors
 
 References

Bhavsar Daivat, Laura Duffy, Hamin Jo, Cynthia Lokker, R. Brian Haynes, Alfonso Iorio, Ana Marusic & Jeremy Y. Ng. 2025. Policies on artificial intelligence chatbots among academic publishers: a cross-sectional audit. Research Integrity and Peer Review 10, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00158-y

Biswas SS. 2023. ChatGPT for Research and Publication: A Step-by-Step Guide. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther; 28 (6): 576-584. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.6.576. Epub 2023 Oct 28. PMID: 38130350; PMCID: PMC10731938.
Cambridge University. 2025. AI guidance Guidance for University of Cambridge Staff on the Administrative Use of Generative AI. Available at: https://www.information-compliance.admin.cam.ac.uk/data-protection/guidance/ai-guidance (accessed Aug. 5, 2025)
COPE Council. 2024. COPE position - Authorship and AI - English. Available at: https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-ai-tools (accessed 4/17/April 17, 2025)
Elkhatat, AM, K. Elsaid, and S. Almeer. 2023. Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text. International Journal of Educational Integrity 19 (1): 1–16. DOI: 10.1007/ s40979-023-00140-5.

Elsevire. 2025. Generative AI policies for journals. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals (accessed April 13, 2025)

Emerald Publishing. 2024. Emerald Publishing’s stance on AI tools in content creation and the peer review process. Available at: https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/news-and-press-releases/emerald-publishings-stance-ai-tools-content-creation-and-peer-review (accessed Aurg. 4, 2025)
Flanagin A, J. Kendall-Taylor, & K. Bibbins-Domingo. 2023. Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots. JAMA 330 (8):702–703. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.12500
Harvard University. 2025. Initial guidelines for the use of Generative AI tools at Harvard. Available at: https://www.huit.harvard.edu/ai/guidelines (accessed Aug 4, 2025)
Hosseini, M., D. B. Resnik, & K. Holmes. 2023. The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Research Ethics 19 (4): 449-465.
IEEE. 2025. Guidelines for Generative AI Usage. Available at: https://www.ieee-ras.org/publications/guidelines-for-generative-ai-usage (accessed Aug. 4, 2025)
Imperial College. 2025. Generative AI guidance. Available at: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/admin-services/library/learning-support/generative-ai-guidance/ (accessed Aug. 5, 2025)
Kar S. K., T. Bansal, S. Modi, & A. Singh. 2024. How Sensitive Are the Free AI-detector Tools in Detecting AI-generated Texts? A Comparison of Popular AI-detector Tools. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 0 (0). doi:10.1177/02537176241247934
Kim, S. J. & K. S. Park. 2020. Influence of the top 10 journal publishers listed in Journal Citation Reports based on six indicators. Science Editing 7 (2): 142-148.
Lund, B. D., & T. Wang. 2023. Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News.  Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4333415 (accessed  AUG 3, 2025)
Meyer, J. G., R. J. Urbanowicz, P. C. N. Martin, K. O'Connor, R. Li, P. C. Peng, T. J. Bright, N. Tatonetti, K. J. Won, G. Gonzalez-Hernandez, & J. H. Moore. 2023. ChatGPT and large language models in academia: opportunities and challenges. Bio Data Mining 16 (1): 20.
MIT. 2025. Guidance for use of Generative AI tools. Available at: https://ist.mit.edu/ai-guidance. (accessed Aug. 5, 2025)
Nature. 2023. Artificial Intelligence (AI). https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/editorial-policies/ai (Accessed Aug. 3, 2025)
Oxford University. 2025. Policy for using Generative AI in Research: guidelines for researchers and professional staff. Available at: https://www.ox.ac.uk/research/support-researchers/research-practice/policy-generative-ai-research (accessed Aug. 5, 2025)

Picazo-Sanchez, P., & L. Ortiz-Martin. 2024. Analysing the impact of ChatGPT in research. Appl Intell 54: 4172–4188 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-024-05298-0

Princeton University. 2025. Guidance on the Use of Generative AI at Princeton. Available at: https://oit.princeton.edu/generative-ai#:~:text=Guidance%20on%20the%20Use%20of%20Generative%20AI%20at%20Princeton&text=Accuracy%20and%20Quality%3A%20Maintain%20oversight,for%20biases%20or%20unintended%20consequences. (accessed Aug. 5, 2025)
Sharifzadeh. R. 2024. ChatGPT as Co-Author? AI and Research Ethics. Ethics in Progress 15 (1): 155–173.

Springer. 2025. Artificial Intelligence (AI). Available at: https://www.springer.com/gp/editorial-policies/artificial-intelligence--ai-/25428500?srsltid=AfmBOopdTqlceStqsRjGYimkzJaicakfHRqguV6CNCaI11CtcoxrI343 (accessed April 13, 2025)

Stanford University. 2023. Generative AI Policy Guidance. Available at: https://communitystandards.stanford.edu/generative-ai-policy-guidance (accessed Aug. 5, 2025)

STM. 2023. Generative AI in Scholarly Communications; Ethical and Practical Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI in the Publication Process. Available at: https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/stm.offloadmedia/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/10031822/STM-GENERATIVE-AI-PAPER-2023-1.pdf (accessed: April 18, 2025)
Taylor and Francis. 2025. AI Policy. Available at: https://taylorandfrancis.com/our-policies/ai-policy/ (accessed: April 15, 2025)
UC Berkeley. 2025. Appropriate Use of Generative AI Tools. Available at: https://oercs.berkeley.edu/appropriate-use-generative-ai-tools (Aug. 5, 2025) 
UChicago. 2024. Generative AI Guidance. Available at: https://genai.uchicago.edu/en/about/generative-ai-guidance (accessed Aug. 5, 2025)
Watkins, R. 2024. Guidance for researchers and peer-reviewers on the ethical use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in scientific research workflows. AI Ethics 4, 969–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00294-5
Weber-Wulff, D., A. Anohina-Naumeca, S. Bjelobaba, Tomáš Foltýnek, Jean Guerrero-Dib, Olumide Popoola, Petr Šigut & Lorna Waddington. 2023. Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. Int J Educ Integr 19: 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z
Wen Jiaxin, Pei Ke, Hao Sun, Zhexin Zhang, Chengfei Li, Jinfeng Bai, and Minlie Huang. 2023. Unveiling the Implicit Toxicity in Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1322–1338, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Wiley. 2025. Using AI tools in your writing. Available at: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/publish/book/ai-guidelines (accessed: April 14, 2025)

Xames, M. D., & J. Shefa. 2023. ChatGPT for research and publication: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching 6 (1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.20, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4381803 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4381803
Xames, M. D., & J. Shefa. 2023. ChatGPT for research and publication: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.20, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4381803 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4381803
Yale University. 2023. Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI Tools Wednesday. Available at: https://provost.yale.edu/news/guidelines-use-generative-ai-tools (accessed Aug. 5, 2025)
Zielinski, C., M. A. Winker, R. Aggarwal, L. E. Ferris, M. Heinemann, J. F. Lapeña, S. A. Pai, E. Ing, L. Citrome, M. Alam, M. Voight, F. Habibzadeh. 2023. for the WAME Board. Chatbots, Generative AI, and Scholarly Manuscripts. WAME Recommendations on Chatbots and Generative Artificial Intelligence in Relation to Scholarly Publications. WAME. May 31, 2023 https://wame.org/page3.php?id=106 (accessed May 31, 2023)

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 14 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 19 مهر 1404